Jorgensen, C. M.,
& Lambert, L. (2012). Inclusion means more than just being "in:"
planning full participation of students with intellectual and other
developmental disabilities in the general education classroom. International
Journal of Whole Schooling, 8(2), 21-36.
This article describes a process to
plan for students with intellectual disabilities to be fully included in the
general education classroom. The journal
article addresses a five step question based process that takes place each week
to plan lessons for each subject area. The questions are:
1.
What is the general education instructional
routine?
2.
What are the students without disabilities doing to participate in the instructional
routine?
3.
Can the student with the disability participate
in the same way in all components of the instructional routine or does the
student need an alternate way to participate?
4.
What supports does the student need to
participate using alternate means?
5.
Who will prepare the supports?
Further, the article includes a
model that can be used for teachers to answer the above questions. The main goal is to ensure that all students
are receiving instruction grounded in the curriculum. The author also provides districts with
suggestions to find the time needed for this instructional planning.
My
own experience has been with children with mild intellectual disabilities. I appreciate the model given and is something
I could see myself using during plan time between the general and special
education teacher. For true inclusion to be successful, these steps must be
taken. The special education teacher must know the topics of the lesson, the
delivery that will be used and the expectations of the students. Only then will the interventions chosen have
an impact on the learning
The
ideas and models included in this article are wonderful for a school in a
perfect world. Unfortunately, this is
not a place I have ever seen. I
certainly will plan better in the future with my partnered teacher. I appreciate that I need to find the time to
discuss the delivery of the lesson as well as the goals set out for each
student. I am guilty of sharing only the
topics and assessments to be modified. My
biggest worry for the inclusion for students with intellectual disabilities is
the level of the disability. While I can
appreciate these working in mild cases, I do not see the possibility of a
positive outcome for students with severe intellectual disabilities. My mom was a nurse for CPS for the past 20
years and her last assignment was to be one-on-one with a girl at Curie High
School. She went from class to class including
algebra, chemistry and writing. She was non-verbal and confined to a wheel
chair. No steps in his article would
benefit her learning-inclusion at its worst!
The article you choose sounds like it is a valuable resource for general education and special education teachers. The questions your article posed are great questions that general education should ask when they are planning their instruction. I will keep those questions in mind when I am doing my own planning.
ReplyDeleteI appreciate your critique of this article. This articles gives great suggestions, and in the ideal educational environment, they are very helpful. However, true inclusion for students with intellectual disabilities takes time (for both teachers) and until schools are structured to give this time, I don't know how successful inclusion will be. I am fighting this fight right now. Inclusion is more than a student being physically in the classroom, the student needs to be included in all aspects.
ReplyDelete